<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC consulting public over iPlayer on-demand service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2007/02/01/bbc-consulting-public-over-iplayer-on-demand-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2007/02/01/bbc-consulting-public-over-iplayer-on-demand-service/</link>
	<description>internet mischief</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spalpeen :: BBC online is a big, fat, cliché</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2007/02/01/bbc-consulting-public-over-iplayer-on-demand-service/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Spalpeen :: BBC online is a big, fat, cliché</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=18#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] with little to no journalism experience are kicking their arses. There&#8217;s a reason why the BBC has to ask the public whether or not they should give all taxpayers access to BBC content online. They don&#8217;t have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with little to no journalism experience are kicking their arses. There&#8217;s a reason why the BBC has to ask the public whether or not they should give all taxpayers access to BBC content online. They don&#8217;t have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mycroft</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2007/02/01/bbc-consulting-public-over-iplayer-on-demand-service/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mycroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=18#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Good answers, I wrote something similar. Basically no-drm, no-drm, no-drm! The trusts report doesn't recognise a non-drm solution though, just a platform agnostic one. Only the radio downloads will be DRM free. I've made it clear to them that as theyve tried to do with the Creative Archive, rights should be cleared to get as much as possible DRM free. 

Also, it doesnt say anything in the report about video quality or HD which is dissappointing, they have the opportunity to go much further rather than doing less than we already have, all their channels can be freely recording after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good answers, I wrote something similar. Basically no-drm, no-drm, no-drm! The trusts report doesn&#8217;t recognise a non-drm solution though, just a platform agnostic one. Only the radio downloads will be DRM free. I&#8217;ve made it clear to them that as theyve tried to do with the Creative Archive, rights should be cleared to get as much as possible DRM free. </p>
<p>Also, it doesnt say anything in the report about video quality or HD which is dissappointing, they have the opportunity to go much further rather than doing less than we already have, all their channels can be freely recording after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.217 seconds -->
