January 2009

My application to City University, Investigative Journalism MA

For my application to City University’s Investigative Journalism MA, I had to write 250 words on what attracted me to investigative journalism and about a subject I would like to investigate. Here’s what I wrote:

I am attracted to ‘Investigative Journalism’ because investigation is a universal skill required for all types of reporting. By studying an MA at City University in Investigative Journalism, I seek to follow in the footsteps of reporters like Seymour Hersh, Lowell Bergman, the late Lasantha Wickramatunga, and Ben Goldacre. Acting as an ethical gatekeeper to the truth, I wish to contribute to the cause of uncovering information that those in positions of authority may wish to conceal. This I consider to be the pinnacle of all reporting.

I am realistic about the profession that I have chosen. Much of the debate about the state of contemporary journalism features ‘doomsayer’ journalists complaining about the lack of time they have to focus on stories, due to economic pressures placed on them by their employers. I believe that the onus is on journalists themselves to fix the problem! If journalists wish to avoid being forced to produce “churnalism” or infotainment-style “investigative” reports, they must take a central role in pioneering new financial models to support their work. Achieving success, utilising sound research skills, having my work published, read and reviewed, has driven me forward to seek a future within investigative journalism.

My work as a writer and producer at two successful American start-up companies was, in part, a personal investigation into the opportunities offered by the internet for supporting and sustaining journalism. Attempting to find a successful sustainable model for independent investigative journalism is a project I will continue to pursue.

Posting inspired by Jeff Jarvis’ post from Davos. In particular, this sentence: “It’s our job to find out what people don’t want to tell us. Maybe that is the real definition of reporting. The rest is just information.”

I’m attending Nick Davies and David Leigh’s Masterclass in Investigative Reporting (thanks to Michael Haddon for hooking me up with a ticket!), so do make sure to send me a twitter if you’ll be there too.

Blogging
Jeff Jarvis
Journalism

Comments (1)

Permalink

Open-source miniature URL generating software to help print-based media migrate to the web

I sent this pitch into 4iP the other month, which was rejected for the following reasons: “This idea is great, but it would more likely be a print publication that would be interested in supporting the development of such a tool, rather than 4iP or Channel 4 which is investing only in multimedia platforms and content. There is also a risk that the idea is highly copiable by existing competition, at relatively low cost. Justifying the technical outlay for the basic shortening of URLs is therefore hard to justify. Do check out the aims of the fund and our submissions guidelines (http://www.4ip.org.uk) and please keep submitting your proposals.”

I agree with this rejection, but just thought I’d post my pitch on here to see what other people think of it.

Description

Similar to miniature URL generators like TinyURL, but allowing individual newspaper and magazine publishers to generate miniature URLs using their own publications’ web domain. The Guardian currently uses http://tinyurl.com to send print readers to online sources. This proposal would allow The Guardian to generate miniature URLs using its own domain. I.e. It could use http://guardian.co.uk/j0t9 rather than http://tinyurl.com/j0t9 to send a print reader to http://apple.com

Needs and Benefits

Allows publishers to use their own domain to control how and where it is sending print users to online sources, without relying on third party websites (which may go down, become unreliable, or potentially become malicious). Increases branding opportunities for publishers. Allows synchronisation of web and print-based content.

Approach

Reaching out to major print and online publications directly. Providing a free service for blogs and other content websites to make miniature URLs on their own domains. Social Media Marketing on blogs and social networks.

Competition

Several miniature URL websites are currently available, including TinyURL, SnipURL, NotLong. Ours is better because it allows individual publishers to control the domain name being used, and protects against the potential for 3rd party services to go offline, become unreliable, or become malicious.

Blogging
Data
Internet

Comments (2)

Permalink

What is twitter?

Jon Bernstein, Multimedia Editor at Channel 4 News, sent this email which I put together out to the Channel 4 News office, after the Twitpic story of Flight 1050 came up in the 9.30AM morning meeting. I’m reposting it here:

Twitter is a wire service for individuals. It allows individuals to share details of their life. Most people use it to let friends know what they are doing, what they are thinking, and what they are seeing.

Some things that were reported first on twitter include:

One of the first good pictures from the Flight 1050 crash
http://twitter.com/jkrums/status/1121915133
http://twitpic.com/135xa

Many direct reports from people caught up in the Mumbai attacks
http://twitter.com/dupreee/status/1025231955
http://twitter.com/kari_shma/status/1024862554
http://twitter.com/gsik/status/1024862642

An American student in Egypt twittered his arrest for photographing a protest, alerting friends and family, who got him a lawyer
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/16/twitter-saves-man-from-egyptian-justice/
http://twitter.com/jamesbuck/statuses/786571964

A person caught in a Denver plane crash
http://twitter.com/2drinksbehind/status/1069832870
http://twitpic.com/ut2c

This video is very useful for describing what twitter is:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o

This twitter account is very useful for catching news reported first on twitter:
http://twitter.com/BreakingNewsOn

What Channel 4 News viewers think twitter is:
“the headlines of your life”
“your day/thought/political opinion is 140 characters or less”
“an ongoing global pub conversation”
“Show off. Moan. Follow. Reply. Be useful. Be funny. Be addicted.”

Who twitters?

Many viewers of Channel 4 News
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=channel4news

A handful of MPs
http://tweetminster.co.uk/mps/tweeters

Celebrities twitter (or have their staff do it for them)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jan/11/twitter-celebs
http://twitter.com/DowningStreet
http://twitter.com/KarlRove
http://twitter.com/andy_murray
http://twitter.com/wossy (Jonathan Ross)

Further reading
http://www.journalism.co.uk/7/articles/531439.php
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/3530640/Mumbai-attacks-Twitter-and-Flickr-used-to-break-news-Bombay-India.html

Blogging
Twitter

Comments (1)

Permalink

NUJ blogger story: the changing role of the freelancer

Rebecca Elvin is a Print Journalism student at The University of Huddersfield, and she’s writing a dissertation on ‘the changing role of the freelancer.’ She contacted me to see if I could answer some questions about joining the NUJ as the first “full time blogger.” Here they are, along with my answers.

So you have had your application for membership at the NUJ approved as a full-time freelance professional blogger. What is the difference between you and the thousands of other people that blog?

I applied to join the NUJ as a full-time blogger for Engadget.com, a very popular consumer technology blog (public numbers put it at somewhere around 4 million unique users per month: during one conference last year the site got 6.4 million page views in one hour. That’s traffic that rivals national newspaper websites).

What most people don’t see with Engadget is the extremely tight editorial control on the site. Behind the scenes, you have a team of editors who are constantly maintaining the unique voice of the site, and making sure that the high ethical standards for the site are being met. That’s what sets Engadget and other professional blogs apart from the huge majority of blogs out there. The internal ethical guidelines for Engadget are as strict as The New York Times.

What made you apply to the NUJ?

I applied to the NUJ for two reasons:

1) I read an editorial by The Guardian’s Roy Greenslade responding to an article by the NUJ’s Donnacha DeLong about how he had decided to leave the NUJ because in his view, it had failed to represent him as a journalist. Seeing that, I thought that leaving the NUJ was hardly going to help the situation. So I decided to join partially out of the principle that it’s easier to improve something if you get directly involved with its operation.

2) Because I felt that my compensation at Engadget wasn’t satisfactory. I was being paid in dollars (while living in the UK, when the currency rate was $2:£1), and although these matters were known by the editor at the time (Ryan Block) and he had offered to increase my pay to offset this, and had mentioned the possibility of a full-time salaried position at the site, I felt that I needed to get some advice. Engadget.com is owned by Weblogs, Inc., which is in turned by AOL, which should have been paying its writers a lot more than it did at the time. Note that was mid-2007. I have no idea how much writers get paid at Weblogs, Inc. now. 

What do you think the benefits on joining the NUJ will be?

So far the main benefit I’ve received has come from the publicity around my application. It’s also quite something to be able to put on your CV that you were the first blogger to join one of the most established unions for journalists. In the future, I consider my NUJ membership as a form of insurance policy. Hopefully I won’t have any trouble with employers in the future, but I take comfort from the fact that I’ll have someone to call in case an employer is late sending a freelance cheque, or worse.

What direction do you think the future of online journalism is heading?

More collaboration between writers and readers. More and better quality video. More and larger images. A greater number of smaller, faster and more flexible publications beating bigger, slower and inflexible publications to the punch. New technologies that push out the old technologies, and the publications that continue to cling to them. I’d like to think that mainstream media sites will learn how to link properly (i.e. often, and to the sources they cite), and that the process of journalism carried out by the MSM will become a little bit more transparent.

Do you think there could be any conflicting factors between the traditional media and bloggers?

The real conflict is between traditional methods of presenting information on the web, and newer methods of presenting information on the web. I see no reason to read Ben Goldacre’s column at Guardian.co.uk, because his blog, Bad Science, gives me the same content, plus a whole lot more (it’s easier to find, it features all his other posts in one location, it features the stuff The Guardian edited out). There’s no reason for me to read his column (traditional media) because the blog (newer media) gives me more. It really is as simple as that.

Pitting “bloggers” in conflict against mainstream media is misguided, because as you see in the example above, Ben Goldacre is both a producer of traditional media *and* a blogger. The same person publishing content on newer online publishing formats beats the same person publishing content on traditional online publishing formats. It’s time that newspapers figured this out!

What does your job involve?

Currently I’m a student in my final year at Hull University, studying History and Politics. I’m soon to start working for Catch21 Productions, which produces online video and arranges events across the country on a theme of getting young people involved with politics. It was founded by ex-Hull students, and I’m very excited about helping out there!

My work at Engadget primarily involved writing ~200-word blog posts on consumer technology topics. Secondary to that was finding things to write about, which involves searching through a ridiculously huge index of RSS feeds, a rapidly updated tips box for readers to send in news, and live coverage of news events (keynotes, product reviews). The second task was shared out amongst the writers of the site, so at some point during your shift you’d be “on duty” and singly devoted to finding and dishing out news items to other writers.

Have you trained as a journalist?

I’ve had no formal training as a journalist. Everything I know about journalism comes from looking at how established journalists and news organisations do things, and attempting to do it better.

How do make a living out of blogging?

Currently I don’t earn a living from blogging, but through Weblogs, Inc. I received a cheque every month for writing a certain number of blog posts every month. In my case, I wouldn’t call it a living, but it was enough for me to justify spending time on something I enjoyed doing.

Would there be an option to work as a staffed blogger or have you actively chosen to be freelance? If so, why.

Yes, I had been offered the option of potentially becoming a staff blogger at Engadget. The harder I worked, the quicker I could have achieved that. I never achieved it due to other pressures (being a full time student) and the fact that I enjoyed the level I was working at. I did it primarily for fun, to make contacts and to hone my skills as a writer/reporter. I eventually left to go work on Mahalo Daily for a year, which was also about having fun and honing my skills - in that case through producing video.

Blogging
Catch21
Content
Dissertation
Engadget
Future
Joystiq
Mahalo
Newspapers
Online
Video

Comments (0)

Permalink

Tre Hardson Feat. Fatlip Music Video - AyYoMyMan


I helped fund this video, and I’m immensely proud of it! Massive props to Michael Gallagher who did a lot of the work, and the Directors Will Copeland/Little Red Robot!

Pharcyde is an extremely cool group. Also make sure to check out What’s Up Fatlip?

Media
Online
Video

Comments (1)

Permalink

Whenever I see a complete douchebag with a pretty girl, I think of this scene from Annie Hall

[Alvy addresses a pair of strangers on the street]
Alvy Singer: Here, you look like a very happy couple, um, are you?
Female street stranger: Yeah.
Alvy Singer: Yeah? So, so, how do you account for it?
Female street stranger: Uh, I’m very shallow and empty and I have no ideas and nothing interesting to say.
Male street stranger: And I’m exactly the same way.
Alvy Singer: I see. Wow. That’s very interesting. So you’ve managed to work out something?

[Thanks, IMDB]

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

How to teach journalists SEO

Give everyone at the company unrestricted access to detailed traffic information. Simple as that.

Give them everything that sitemeter tells me about this site, and more! Graphs, charts, pie charts, 3D graphics. Everything. Every journalist, producer, editor, assistant, janitor(!) should know exactly how people are reading their website, and how they got there. It’s the only way to train people how to use SEO (advisors and consultants often have a background of spam, so you don’t want them anywhere near your precious brand).

This came from an article about whether or not SEOs and Journalists can get along. If the answer is no, then the whole journalism industry is fucked. Seriously, they might as well go and learn carpentry. If journalists can’t figure out SEO, then there is literally no hope for them or their employers. Fortunately, there’s a whole mini-industry developing where people do know how to do SEO properly. Just check out any site from Gawker or Weblogs, Inc. to see how to effectively work with search engines.

Oh and by the way, any sense of nostalgia or pride that journalists have about the way they write is fluff. A common argument is “oh I can’t write this way because it sounds like I’m writing for a robot.” Here’s a surprise: you are. But the reality is that I’d take a rigid, descriptive headline over the pun-filled crap that most tabloids write anyday. It’s about time the focus shifted towards descriptions of fact, and away from boring and repetitive puns. The skill of headline writing has changed. Get over it.

That’s not to say you don’t have to write for human readers. Here I’m quoting an email from Vladimir Cole, editor of Joystiq.com when he sent in 2005.

In this age of RSS syndication and cross-syndication, writing good headlines is very, very important. Headlines either draw or repulse readers.

Here’s a bit of text on headlines from a book I’ve had on my shelf for about 8 years…. (finally had occasion to open it!)

Editors who cannot let an ineffective headline see print may drive staff bananas, but there is a method to their madness: The best story in the world is worthless if no one reads it. Media with staff who specialize in head writing are fortunate. Some publications—such as a tabloid out of Florida—will pay a headline writer obscene sums of money because they know how heads affect readership. But in small editorial operations [that’s us!], almost every staffer has a shot at writing heads and must internalize two basic rules or live with rewrites. A headline must:

1. Let the reader know how the story differs from previous stories on similar topics; and
2. Pique the reader’s interest anew.

WEST SIDE FIRE KILLS FIVE piques only a sense of déjà vu. [The Joystiq equivalent would be NINTENDO REVOLUTION CONTROLLER DESIGN LEAK?] FIVE DIE AS SMOKE DETECTOR FAILS does the job if the smoke-detector angle is new. If not, the writer must dig deeper into the particulars or reach for some kind of device to stir interest. “FOOLPROOF” INSULATOR MELTS; FIVE DIE IN FLAMES, or “BARGAIN” SMOKE DETECTOR BLAMED IN DEATH OF FIVE and so on. The challenge to write fresh headlines is perhaps greatest in trade publications [like Joystiq!!], covering the same narrow subject in issue after issue.

Hope he doesn’t mind.

Also, here’s an article from 2006 in the New York Times about writing for search engines. This isn’t new information. We’ve known for half a decade that you had to write for search engines to be successful online. It’s time journalists realised this!

On the topic of being first, there’s the case of the DS Lite announcement in 2006. Joystiq was the first blog to report on Nintendo’s DS Lite announcement. The result was maybe two or three immediate incoming links from blogs. Not very significant. It turns out that that’s not what’s important. What’s centrally important is that we were the first to be indexed by Google to use the terms: “nintendo ds lite” Three months later, we were still number one in Google for that term (several links higher than a greatly better funded website, IGN). Google gives much higher weight to sites that have the news first. That suggested that we focus on speed when blogging items, which is the reality of the situation with blogs like Engadget and Joystiq.

Oh and by the way, if you copy me and start using blockquote code in your article, you’re a bad SEO! Blockquotes suck for SEO, because Google thinks they’re not original content (and they’re generally not, because you’re quoting a huge section of someone else’s work). In this case, I get away with it because I’m quoting an internal email that Google has never seen before. You should know this!

Blogging

Comments (0)

Permalink

Catch21 on gun crime, the CCF and youth activities

Catch21 got Emily Thornberry MP, Mark Field MP and Nick Harvey MP on to talk about Boris Johnson’s off-hand suggestion for National Service for young people, knife crime and how to encourage young people to volunteer.

Catch21
Deliberative Democracy
Democracy
Government
Journalism
Online
Politicians
Politics

Comments (0)

Permalink

Ben Goldacre on Bad Science and Sensational Journalism


Ben Goldacre of Bad Science talks about Sensationalised Science Reporting from Conrad on Vimeo.

I interviewed Ben Goldacre (who writes about bad science for The Guardian and The Times) after his talk at the Weird Science event at Conway Hall. Reasons for conducting the interview in the toilet: it was the only quiet place in Conway Hall, and it was funny.

Blogging
Journalism

Comments (1)

Permalink

Newspapers of September 12th, 2001

Daily Mail September 11th

I was rustling through the attic and found these newspapers bought on September 12th, 2001, the day after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Interesting to see how the different newspapers approached such horrible news. Also, BoingBoing just picked it up, and there are some interesting comments.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink