<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on The Guardian&#8217;s linking practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/03/28/more-on-the-guardians-linking-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/03/28/more-on-the-guardians-linking-practices/</link>
	<description>internet mischief</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spalpeen :: Guardian.co.uk&#8217;s poor linking practices continue, Guardian video fixed (a bit)</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/03/28/more-on-the-guardians-linking-practices/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Spalpeen :: Guardian.co.uk&#8217;s poor linking practices continue, Guardian video fixed (a bit)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=366#comment-636</guid>
		<description>[...] The Guardian&#8217;s poor linking practices (which I&#8217;ve blogged about previously) continue to cripple the www.guardian.co.uk&#8217;s usefulness. At time of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Guardian&#8217;s poor linking practices (which I&#8217;ve blogged about previously) continue to cripple the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk&#8217;s" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk&#8217;s</a> usefulness. At time of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.216 seconds -->
