<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online journalism writing tips at City University</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/11/16/online-journalism-writing-tips-at-city-university/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/11/16/online-journalism-writing-tips-at-city-university/</link>
	<description>internet mischief</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angus Batey</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/11/16/online-journalism-writing-tips-at-city-university/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Batey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=478#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Conrad. 

Re. the F-shape of reading - that link seems to be talking mainly about search and e-commerce pages: has anyone done any studies at all to show whether it applies to journalism or blogs? One's instinct is to presume that if people are scanning for information (product features and price; relevance of proffered links to original query) they will read in that way, but may be more likely to read in a more in-depth, thorough way when they arrive at a page which contains text they either searched for, or were interested enough to click on a link to read about in more detail. (The first graphic on the page you link to, of the reading pattern of a corporate "about us" page, does seem to bear this out somewhat, in that the "bars" of the "F" are much thicker.)

Cheers,

AB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Conrad. </p>
<p>Re. the F-shape of reading - that link seems to be talking mainly about search and e-commerce pages: has anyone done any studies at all to show whether it applies to journalism or blogs? One&#8217;s instinct is to presume that if people are scanning for information (product features and price; relevance of proffered links to original query) they will read in that way, but may be more likely to read in a more in-depth, thorough way when they arrive at a page which contains text they either searched for, or were interested enough to click on a link to read about in more detail. (The first graphic on the page you link to, of the reading pattern of a corporate &#8220;about us&#8221; page, does seem to bear this out somewhat, in that the &#8220;bars&#8221; of the &#8220;F&#8221; are much thicker.)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>AB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/11/16/online-journalism-writing-tips-at-city-university/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=478#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Interesting read ... thanks for taking the trouble to stick it up here .. I'm watching carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read &#8230; thanks for taking the trouble to stick it up here .. I&#8217;m watching carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/2009/11/16/online-journalism-writing-tips-at-city-university/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spalpeen.co.uk/?p=478#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Interesting points, esp your own analysis. Seems there's lots to debate even about writing for the web. I quite like the F-pattern idea, but it would be a shame to put all these rules into web writing when it's a new medium, which craves room for experimentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points, esp your own analysis. Seems there&#8217;s lots to debate even about writing for the web. I quite like the F-pattern idea, but it would be a shame to put all these rules into web writing when it&#8217;s a new medium, which craves room for experimentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.431 seconds -->
